Suchergebnisse
Filter
49 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Enforcing Fintech Competition: Some Reflections on Institutional Design
In: Forthcoming in Konstantinos Stylianou, Marios Iacovides, and Björn Lundqvist (eds), Fintech Competition: Law, Policy, and Market Organisation (Bloomsbury Hart, 2023)
SSRN
SSRN
Open Markets in the Era of Fintech and Big Tech: Lessons for the Institutional Design of Competition Policy
In: final version Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 12 (2024), 148-188, under the title 'Competition enforcement versus regulation as market-opening tools: an application to banking and payment systems'
SSRN
The Directive on Unfair Trading Practices in the Agri-Food Supply Chain: Regulatory Ambitions and Legal Instruments
In: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 2021, 843–891
SSRN
Law-Making and Adjudication for the Internal Market: The Role of Economic Reasoning
In: final version in Karl Riesenhuber (ed), European Legal Method, Intersentia (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland) 2nd ed. 2021, 87–114
SSRN
Working paper
Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law in Germany
In: Country report (Chapter 5) in Ferdinand Wollenschläger, Wolfgang Wurmnest and Thomas M.J. Möllers (eds.), Private Enforcement of European Competition and State Aid Law, Wolters Kluwer 2020.
SSRN
Working paper
Private Enforcement versus Public Enforcement
In: Franz Hofmann and Franziska Kurz (eds.), Law of Remedies. A European Perspective, Intersentia 2019, 107-131
SSRN
Striking a Balance of Power between the Court of Justice and the EU Legislature: The Law on Competition Damages Actions as a Paradigm
In: European Law Review, Band 43, Heft 6, S. 837-857
SSRN
Rights, remedies and effective enforcement in air transportation: Ruijssenaars
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 54, Heft 6, S. 1867-1886
ISSN: 0165-0750
Rights, Remedies and Effective Enforcement in Air Transportation: Ruijssenaars
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 54, Heft 6
SSRN
Defining the Leeway for Business Cooperation: Remaining Peculiarities under German Competition Law after Its Europeanisation
In: final version in Juan Ignacio Ruiz Peris and Carmen Estevan de Quesada (eds), Cooperación empresarial y derecho de la competencia / Buisness cooperation and competition law, Tirant lo Blanch (Valencia) 2019, 147–173
SSRN
Regelsetzung im Kartellprivatrecht: Schadensersatzhaftung als Herausforderung für das institutionelle Gleichgewicht in der EU (Regulating Private Law in the Context of Antitrust: Cartel Damages Law as a Challenge to the Institutional Balance in the EU)
In: final version in Florian Möslein (ed), Regelsetzung im Privatrecht, Mohr Siebeck (Tübingen) 2019, 331–372
SSRN
Working paper
Umbrella pricing and cartel damages under EU competition law
This article explores whether cartelists should be liable for losses resulting from umbrella pricing, thereby critically evaluating the ECJ's judgment in "Kone". Since the EU legislature did not resolve the question of liability for umbrella pricing, it has to be evaluated in accordance with national law, which must however comply with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness pursuant to Article 4(3) TEU. Therefore and in accordance with the Court's judgment in "Courage", the decisive criterion should be the effect a cartelist's liability for umbrella pricing would have on effective and efficient enforcement of competition law. An analysis based on the standard model of optimal sanctioning reveals the ambivalent effect of such a liability. Thus, in view of opposing risks of systematic over- and under-deterrence and in accordance with the principle of institutional balance, the Court has to leave the EU legislature and the national legislatures, respectively, with the discretion not to provide for compensation in the case of umbrella effects.
BASE
Umbrella Pricing and Cartel Damages under EU Competition Law
In: EUI Department of Law Research Paper No. 2015/18, final version European Competition Journal 11 (2015) 135-167
SSRN
Working paper